$4 Million Judgment For LASIK Patient - Pilot Not Told Of Potential Night Vision Problems

JUDGE REINSTATES JUDGMENT IN PILOT'S EYE OPERATION

TUCSON, Ariz., November 2, 2004 (AP). A Tucson judge has reinstated a
four (m) million dollar judgment in the case of a former airline pilot
whose career ended after an eye operation.

Former United Airlines pilot Steve Post claimed in his May 2002
lawsuit that his night vision was reduced by the LASIK eye surgery he
received by University Physicians Healthcare (University of Arizona).

LASIK is intended to eliminate or reduce dependency on eyeglasses or
contacts.

Post testified he would not have had the surgery had he been told he
was at increased risk for night vision problems.

Judge Kenneth Lee granted U-P-I's motion for a new trial but the
Arizona Court of Appeals overturned the ruling in January.

But the Arizona Supreme Court declined to review it this summer and
Lee reinstated the verdict late last week.

The president and C-E-O of U-P-I calls the ruling disappointing.

Don't you think this subject belongs in alt.lasik-eyes ?


--
Jan (normally Dutch spoken)

Neither pro, nor anti, LASIK,LASEK,PRK etc......

"Wizkid" <(E-Mail Removed)> schreef in bericht
news:(E-Mail Removed) om...
> JUDGE REINSTATES JUDGMENT IN PILOT'S EYE OPERATION

Dear Gospa,

This suggests that the pilot should have been given a detailed
waring of the risks of Lasik. A signed "consent" listing
ALL the risks should have been signed by this pilot.

Also, I wonder exactly what is minus-lens prescription
was BEFORE he had Lasik. Do you think it was -1.0 diopters?

Any more details?

Best,

Otis
Engineer


______


(E-Mail Removed) (Wizkid) wrote in message news:<(E-Mail Removed). com>...
> JUDGE REINSTATES JUDGMENT IN PILOT'S EYE OPERATION
>
> TUCSON, Ariz., November 2, 2004 (AP). A Tucson judge has reinstated a
> four (m) million dollar judgment in the case of a former airline pilot
> whose career ended after an eye operation.
>
> Former United Airlines pilot Steve Post claimed in his May 2002
> lawsuit that his night vision was reduced by the LASIK eye surgery he
> received by University Physicians Healthcare (University of Arizona).
>
> LASIK is intended to eliminate or reduce dependency on eyeglasses or
> contacts.
>
> Post testified he would not have had the surgery had he been told he
> was at increased risk for night vision problems.
>
> Judge Kenneth Lee granted U-P-I's motion for a new trial but the
> Arizona Court of Appeals overturned the ruling in January.
>
> But the Arizona Supreme Court declined to review it this summer and
> Lee reinstated the verdict late last week.
>
> The president and C-E-O of U-P-I calls the ruling disappointing.

>Don't you think this subject belongs in alt.lasik-eyes ?

He cross-linked the post on both newsgroups. WizKid is carrying a
banner that he seems to want everyone to see.

Glenn Hagele
Executive Director
Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance

Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org

http://www.USAEyes.org
http://www.ComplicatedEyes.org

I am not a doctor.