In article <(E-Mail Removed) .com>,
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> vision 20/70 in both eyes, then said that there was nothing medically
> wrong with her eyes (other than the bit of residual inflammation), that
> she did not need glasses even, and that if anything she was a bit
> FAR-sighted. (She does seem to be able to still see really well at a
> distance.)
>
> A little additional information: I started wearing glasses at age 8 and
> nearsightedness is quite pronounced in my side of the family. My
> daughter is a voracious reader (middle-school level or above) and
> spends better than an hour every day reading. She spends very little
> time ( ~ 3 hours/week) in front of a TV or computer monitor.
>
> Does any of this make sense? Wouldn't 20/70 vision require glasses?
I would think so, but I'm no doctor. Be aware that farsighted people
can need glasses just as much as nearsighted people.
The important thing is whether she can see well enough to do what she
needs. If she is farsighted, and isn't having problems reading, then
glasses are just a hassle.
--
Dan Abel
(E-Mail Removed)
Petaluma, California, USA