In article <fah2nm$men$(E-Mail Removed)>,
"Nina" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> "michael toulch" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed) oups.com...
> > On Aug 19, 10:41 am, "Nina" <n...@NOSPAMpeljesac.info> wrote:
> >> I am wearing glasses for 10 years and now I would like to wear soft
> >> lenses.
> >>
> >> My eyeglass prescription is
> >>
> >> VOD sa -1.75 = sa -0.50 dcyl ax 170 = 0.7 - 0.8
> >> TOD dig N kPa
> >> VOS sa -1.25 = sa -0.75 dcyl ax 0 = 0.7 - 0.8
> >> TOS dig N kPa
> >>
> >> Problem is that I can't find toric soft lenses with -0.50 dcyl (the
> >> smallest
> >> is -0.75). My ophthalmologist gave me purevision soft lenses without
> >> cylinders, but I am not satisfied, because my vision with them is not
> >> perfect, I still have to squint while working on computer or watching TV.
> >>
> >> I would appreciate any advice
> >>
> >> Thank you in advance and excuse my English
> >
> > the left eye has .75 cyl (apparently) so why not try a toric?
> >
> To try toric for left eye and normal for right eye or?
Yes, or toric for both. If you need -.50, then I would think that -.75
would be closer than zero.
ODs like to fit non-toric lenses, when they work. They are easier to
fit, both for the patient and the doctor. Also, some patients balk at
the cost of torics, which are several times more expensive.
Also, if these work for distance, you may be at that age where you need
different correction for close. I wore over the counter reading glasses
over my contacts for close work.
The above is based on my experience as a patient with somewhat similar
problems. Although it is a good idea to find out as much as possible
from everybody (at least that is what I think), your doctor should be
your final authority.
|