On Nov 6, 1:36*pm, PTKen <k-fleis...@nga.gov> wrote:
> On Nov 6, 11:02 am, Dr Judy <mpac...@rogers.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 5, 11:52 am, PTKen <k-fleis...@nga.gov> wrote:
>
> > > Hello. I am planning to implement the Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue Test
> > > at my work. What I am not certain of is whether I also need to
> > > implement a pseudoisochromatic plate test, such a the Ishihara or HRR..
> > > Will the FM 100 hue test tell me everything that the
> > > pseudoisochromatic plate tests do or do I need to supplement it with
> > > the pseudoisochromatic test?
>
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ken
>
> > If you don't know the answer to this question, you do not know enough
> > about colour vision testing to administer the 100 Hue Test and
> > understand its results. *It is a complex test and very time consuming
> > to administer. *For what purposes are you using the 100 hue test? *If
> > it is the recommended test for licensing, the licensing body should be
> > providing you with details of what tests and test results are
> > acceptable, whether plates would be an acceptable alternative and
> > someone should be training you on how to administer the tests.
>
> > Dr Judy
>
> While I appreciate you taking the time to reply to my post, I don't
> feel I need to justify why I asked the question, why I need to
> implement the test(s), or whether or not I'm qualified to administer
> the test(s) and interpret the results. A simple answer to my question
> would be appreciated.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Ken- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
The simple answer is yes.
The more complex answer is that the 100 Hue test gives quite a bit
more information than the plates, is difficult for the person to do,
is complex to analyse and will find many more minor colour defects
than the plates. Depending on your reason for needing to do colour
vision testing, the plates alone may be enough.
Judy
|