Ant wrote:
>
> thanks for replying
>
> "Dom" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> > Ant wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Recently I went to the optician and was told my long distance eyesight
> >> was not so good but my near vision is fine. I don't like glasses so
> >> that's not an option.
> > How do you know you don't like glasses?
>
> I would find it irritating not having a clear field of view, I'd always be
> trying to look out the corners etc. I've tried on ppl's glasses before so I
> have a feeling of what it would be like.
Does this mean you can't wear sunglasses? It's amazing the nuisance I'm
willing to put up with in order to actually see :-) I don't think you
can know that until you actually try wearing glasses made for YOU. I
could, however, be full of ****. When I got glasses at 16 (I tried on a
friend's glasses and was amazed at how much clearer things were) I
didn't wear them because they were too strong. I was dumb then, I
didn't go back and complain.
> Ah, I had a suspicion that would be the case but I dont think it's a
> practical solution to keep taking out / putting in contacts all the time.
> It would be great if I could wear them constantly and for any activity
> (within reason)
I normally wear contacts for distance and add 99-cent reading glasses
for reading and computer work, which occupies perhaps 85% of my waking
hours. Not a problem, and it would be almost totally great if it were
possible to fit me properly with contacts (which it, unfortunately,
isn't).
--
Cheers,
Bev
================================================== ===============
"There's an apocryphal (I hope not !) story about a Bristol bike
thief found cold, wet and bedraggled one morning, D locked by the
neck to a local bridge." -- Anon
|