Could someone with free access to JAMA get me these two articles? x

http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/55/24/2027
http://archopht.ama-assn.org/cgi/con...act/118/9/1215

On 7 Aug, 21:24, Shinigami Eyes <misa...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint...act/118/9/1215

x-no-archive:

x-no-archive:

x-no-archive:

On 7 Aug, 21:24, Shinigami Eyes <misa...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint...act/118/9/1215

In return for the person who sends me these I offer free transcription
services.

x-no-archive:

Clearly the offer of free transcription services wasn't very appealing.

Sheesh. Now I have to spend $60. Thanks for nothing sci.med.vision

Why couldn't JAMA make their old stuff free for all like the BMJ
does... tut tut

On Aug 9, 10:27*pm, "Mike Tyner" <mty...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> Think of the Venn diagram..
>
> All JAMA subscribers
>
> intersected with
>
> all sci.med.vision readers
>
> intersected with
>
> all who are fascinated with obsolete publications
>
> The three populations just don't overlap. You're surprised?
>
> In 1910, you could mount your donkey and ride into the big city where they
> have a medical library.
>
> Hay is still cheap, too.
>
> "Shinigami Eyes" <misa...@googlemail.com> wrote
>
>
>
> > Sheesh. *Now I have to spend $60. *Thanks for nothing sci.med.vision

Oh Dr. Tyner just the man I need. Doesn't being an optometrist mean
you get free access to JAMA? Could you send me them? Thanks.