Optometry Forums


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Eyeglass Scratch Remover

 
 
greatestitems2005@yahoo.com
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-11-2005, 07:11 PM
Liquid Lense makes scratches on your eyeglasses virtually undetectable.
The amazing fill and seal technology lets you glide over unsightly
scratches, and create a perfectly level seal. Once sealed, you'll never
be able to notice where the scratch used to be. And because of the
special liquid polymer in Liquid Lense, your prescription will never be
altered. You can feel safe using liquid lens on all types of glasses.
The special formula also can remove cloudiness from your lenses. It's
easy to use and you'll save hundreds of dollars on costly lens
replacement each time you treat your scratched glasses. Liquid Lense
now includes UV Inhibitors to protect eyes from harmful UV Rays.

http://www.rkdm.com/liquidlense/

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
DW
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-11-2005, 09:54 PM
Uh-huh... and what's the refraction index of the compound?

 
Reply With Quote
 
LarryDoc
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-12-2005, 04:05 PM
In article <(E-Mail Removed) .com>,
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:

A few things:

1. This kind of product has been around for years and for years it
hasn't worked,

2. They spelled *lens* wrong.

3. You're not allowed to advertise products in this (and almost all
other) USENET newsgroup. You have been reported.

--LB
 
Reply With Quote
 
Neil Brooks
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-12-2005, 04:13 PM
LarryDoc <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>In article <(E-Mail Removed) .com>,
> (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>
>A few things:
>
>1. This kind of product has been around for years and for years it
>hasn't worked,
>
>2. They spelled *lens* wrong.
>
>3. You're not allowed to advertise products in this (and almost all
>other) USENET newsgroup. You have been reported.
>
>--LB


I reported them, too, but . . . as to "lense,"

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionar...onary&va=lense
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=lense


Variant, sure. Am I gonna' use it? Heck no. But, technically, it
doesn't seem to be incorrect. Just silly.

Neil
 
Reply With Quote
 
The Real Bev
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-12-2005, 08:43 PM
Neil Brooks wrote:
>
> LarryDoc <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> >In article <(E-Mail Removed) .com>,
> > (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> >
> >A few things:
> >
> >1. This kind of product has been around for years and for years it
> >hasn't worked,
> >
> >2. They spelled *lens* wrong.
> >
> >3. You're not allowed to advertise products in this (and almost all
> >other) USENET newsgroup. You have been reported.
> >
> >--LB

>
> I reported them, too, but . . . as to "lense,"
>
> http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionar...onary&va=lense
> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=lense
>
> Variant, sure. Am I gonna' use it? Heck no. But, technically, it
> doesn't seem to be incorrect. Just silly.


It's not incorrect in the same way that "different than" is not incorrect --
just giving in to the great ignorant and unwashed masses who don't know any
better. Stand firm. Never give an inch. Spell correktly.

--
Cheers,
Bev
------------------------------------------------
There are 10 types of geek in this world,
those who understand binary and those who don't.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:59 AM.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14