On Oct 23, 12:43 am, "Peter Jason" <p...@jostle.com> wrote:
> "Neil Brooks" <neil0...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> messagenews:(E-Mail Removed) ooglegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Oct 22, 7:09 pm, "Peter Jason"
> > <p...@jostle.com> wrote:
> >> I heard the other day there was a new
> >> machine
> >> for eyeglass prescriptions.
>
> >> Evidently the patient looks into it at an
> >> object (say a small model house) and the
> >> machine determines from this just the type
> >> of
> >> glasses reqd.
>
> >> It can determine Cyl, Sphere & prism with
> >> just one zap.
>
> >> Has anyone heard of this, and can he
> >> supply a
> >> name so I can check it out?
>
> >> Please help, Peter
>
> > Autorefractor
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autorefractor
>
> > It's not new.
>
> Thanks, why then are optometrists still using
> the old machine requiring manual selection of
> lenses?
because they are inaccurate.
>
> I have Sphere/Cyl adjustment and I get
> varying results from different optometrists.
well you'd get WIDELY varying results from an autorefractor. they are
getting better, but still they are inaccurate and serve only as a
useful reference to a good manual refraction.
>
> I have some friends back from overseas, and
> they order their glasses there because this
> "autorefractor" device gives excellent and
> automatic results.
in some Asian countries they will sell you glasses based soley on a
autorefractor reading. bottome line is you'd end up with a lot of
glasses laying around that don't work very well.