<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:a259d8b5-0841-4b71-986d-(E-Mail Removed)...
> My dad was asking me about his reading glasses. His glasses, which
> were prescribed about 10 years ago for reading still work great. He
> has no problems reading whatsoever.
>
> His glasses are somewhat big though, or so it seems. The dimension of
> his glasses are roughly 1 3-4" X 1 1/2". they SEEM larger than
> some of the glasses I see today.
>
> Now.. Is there are reason why some lenses are bigger than others?
> And... does the size of the lenses affect the vision in any way? ie..
> visual field etc...
>
> So... To sum up here. What are the pros and cons of bigger and
> smaller type lenses? Or.... is it purely "cosmetic".
>
> Thanks LEESA
>
> PS: My dad is FARSIGHTED with some astigmatism in both eyes.
The recent trend for very small lenses is a fashion trend, not a medical
one. But it has made possible by stronger frame materials (which need less
bracing at the bridge) and more sophisticated lens designs which enable a
smaller lens.
The benefits of a smaller frame is mostly cosmetic, but a smaller lens is
lighter and less likely to slip out of position on the face (which can
adversely affect vision). A larger lens will usually offer better peripheral
vision.
With a progressive lens (with a separate reading, distance area and
intermediate transition zone) a larger lens often has larger reading and
distance viewing areas. But once you get to a certain size, then going
larger does not have much additional benefit.
|