Re: Does not wearing my glasses damage my eyes?

On 22 Jun, 15:02, "Mandi via MedKB.com" <u36039@uwe> wrote:
> I'm a 17 year old female, about a year ago I got contacts when my glasses
> prescription went up to -1.75. I really love contacts but was told only to
> wear them 5 days in a week. At home I can go without my glasses if I don't
> want to watch tv but my mum is pestering me now to wear them when I'm at home
> because she says I am straining my eyes. At home I just put them on when I
> want to see something but am I doing my eyes some harm, is my mum right?
>
> --
> Message posted viahttp://www.medkb.com

Sent e-mail.
See www.cleareyesight.info for free Bates training, free Bates book.
Free Bates Magazines posted soon.

(E-Mail Removed) wrote in news:a9eea742-fefc-4154-9952-333c5b7a5309
@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:

> Sent e-mail.
> See www.cleareyesight.info for free Bates training, free Bates book.
> Free Bates Magazines posted soon.
>
>


Are they available in braille?


--
Scott
Reverse name to reply
Hak mir nisht ken tshaynik

Dear Scott,

If she wears that over-prescribed minus 16/7 -- and gets stair-case
myopia
from it, why then you are correct. She will need the copy
in braille -- after she develops her detached retina.

Second-opinion best,



On Jun 30, 11:02*am, Scott Seidman <namdiestt...@mindspring.com>
wrote:
> mclearsi...@gmail.com wrote in news:a9eea742-fefc-4154-9952-333c5b7a5309
> @z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
>
> > Sent e-mail.
> > Seewww.cleareyesight.infofor free Bates training, free Bates book.
> > Free Bates Magazines posted soon.
>
> Are they available in braille?
>
> --
> Scott
> Reverse name to reply
> Hak mir nisht ken tshaynik

On Jun 30, 9:55 am, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote:

> If she wears that over-prescribed minus 16/7 -- and gets stair-case
> myopia
> from it, why then you are correct. She will need the copy
> in braille -- after she develops her detached retina.

What is an "over-prescribed minus?"

Do you have any evidence that the original poster's prescription fits
your definition, above?

Do you have any evidence whatsoever that anything works any better
than the following advice:

1) Low, simple myopes may wish to remove their glasses for near work

2) Pay meticulous attention to good visual hygiene, including frequent
breaks,

3) Get lots of fresh air, sunshine, and vigorous exercise,

4) Eat a healthy, balanced diet,

5) Practice ocular motility exercises (a/k/a yoga for the eyes),

6) Use periocular warming

??

This 'protocol' has been scientifically shown to counteract ANY
UNPROVEN ill-effect of a minus lens that you have EVER proposed.

So ... can you do any better??

On Jun 30, 10:13 am, Neil Brooks <neil0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 30, 9:55 am, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote:
>
> > If she wears that over-prescribed minus 16/7 -- and gets stair-case
> > myopia
> > from it, why then you are correct. She will need the copy
> > in braille -- after she develops her detached retina.
>
> What is an "over-prescribed minus?"
>
> Do you have any evidence that the original poster's prescription fits
> your definition, above?
>
> Do you have any evidence whatsoever that anything works any better
> than the following advice:
>
> 1) Low, simple myopes may wish to remove their glasses for near work
>
> 2) Pay meticulous attention to good visual hygiene, including frequent
> breaks,
>
> 3) Get lots of fresh air, sunshine, and vigorous exercise,
>
> 4) Eat a healthy, balanced diet,
>
> 5) Practice ocular motility exercises (a/k/a yoga for the eyes),
>
> 6) Use periocular warming
>
> ??
>
> This 'protocol' has been scientifically shown to counteract ANY
> UNPROVEN ill-effect of a minus lens that you have EVER proposed.
>
> So ... can you do any better??

And ... to clarify my last point ... the "protocol" is my own, but is
based on years of research, including watching hundreds and hundreds
and hundreds of posts of testing that represents inhumane and
irrelevant tests, FOLLOWED by invocation of scientific testing that
shows how even the damage done BY those tests is reversed by one or
more elements of my "protocol."

In other words, even if you stick an unnecessary lens on a particular
species of monkey, 24/7, you can reverse the unrealistically induced
myopia by giving that poor monkey frequent breaks FROM the lens.

But you don't care.

Facts and controlled testing don't get in the way of YOUR opinions ...
at ... all.

<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:a9eea742-fefc-4154-9952-(E-Mail Removed)...
> On 22 Jun, 15:02, "Mandi via MedKB.com" <u36039@uwe> wrote:
>> I'm a 17 year old female, about a year ago I got contacts when my glasses
>> prescription went up to -1.75. I really love contacts but was told only
>> to
>> wear them 5 days in a week. At home I can go without my glasses if I
>> don't
>> want to watch tv but my mum is pestering me now to wear them when I'm at
>> home
>> because she says I am straining my eyes. At home I just put them on when
>> I
>> want to see something but am I doing my eyes some harm, is my mum right?

Your mum is wrong. However, if you drive a car without your lenses, you are
endangering yourself and others, and probably committing a criminal act.

On Jun 30, 11:02*am, Scott Seidman <namdiestt...@mindspring.com>
wrote:
> mclearsi...@gmail.com wrote in news:a9eea742-fefc-4154-9952-333c5b7a5309
> @z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
>
> > Sent e-mail.
> > Seewww.cleareyesight.infofor free Bates training, free Bates book.
> > Free Bates Magazines posted soon.
>
> Are they available in braille?
>
> --
> Scott
> Reverse name to reply
> Hak mir nisht ken tshaynik

No, but that is a great idea.
I will try to post them at the library of congress in braille.
I heard that libraries in europe, england have the magazines.
They might have them in braille.