Bill wrote:
> I'm getting back into RGP contact lenses after a long hiatus, and
> reading the group has helped me a lot. I have a couple of lingering
> questions, though.
>
> 1. Does having dry eyes decrease the amount of oxygen that gets to the
> eye? It seems that even a hyper-Dk lens won't help if there are less
> tears to deliver the oxygen to the cornea.
>
No but dry eyes can make your eyes uncomfortable. If your eyes are dry
then the oxygen can still get to your eyes more directly from the air!
> 2. Does the wetting angle of the lens material only relate to initial
> comfort or all-day comfort? My understanding is that after the lenses
> have been in the eye for a little while, a film develops on the lens
> that reduces the wetting angle on all materials. Does the wetting
> angle really matter?
>
Wetting angle and comfort will vary as lens gets older and more
deposited over the weeks and months. Variations in comfort throughout
the day are often connected with tear film quality/dry eye issues.
> 3. Does the use of eyedrops create a dependency on eyedrops? I work at
> a computer all day, and my eyes often get red and scratchy. Eyedrops
> help, but I wonder if I'm sacrificing long-term comfort for short-term
> comfort by using the eyedrops.
>
It may create a 'psychological' dependency, only in that you realise
that the drops are helping you so you want to keep using them! Eyedrops
don't adversely affect your eyes themselves - assuming you are talking
about ocular lubricants/artificial tears rather than
decongestants/vasoconstrictors etc. Keep using 'em.
> I used to wear Boston ES lenses years ago, and they were OK. Recently
> I've tried the Menicon Z, the Fluorocon, and soon I'll be trying the
> Optimum Extra. My hope was that the low wetting angle of the Optimum
> lenses might help with the dry eye. Does anybody have any opinion on
> these materials (the Optimum in particular)?
>
> TIA -- Bill.
>
Dom
|