In article <(E-Mail Removed) .com>,
"JZ27" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> My old prescription:
>
> L: -4.5
> R: -4.75
>
> I went to the optometrist today and he gave me a new prescription:
>
> L: -4.25
> R: -4.25
>
> He gave me the first prescription a few years ago. Is it normal to have
> my vision improve like that? Or was he that off on the original? I had
> no problem with the stronger prescription. I have a trial pair of
> contacts in now with the -4.25 and feel a slight headache - it's been
> about 4 hours with them in. The trial pair have a slightly bigger BC
> and Diameter (O2Optix)than my previous contacts as well (Optima FW).
> Should I go back for him to recheck? Any thoughts would be appreciated.
> Thank you.
So your prescription changed, the last one being "a few years ago."
Well, that happens. It's one of the reasons I have a job.
You certainly should go back for a re-check. If you were given a "trial
pair", that's what that means. You MUST return for follow-up in order to
finalize your prescription prior to ordering lenses. I would assume you
were told this.
Second point: The new lens is a different design than the former and the
effective power is not necessarily equal. .25 or .50 difference is
certainly possible.
Third point: O2Optix has more than 10 times the oxygen permeability than
the Optima. This might allow a reversal of cornea compression/swelling
and that can easily relate to a .5 difference in power.
Don't be surprised if your Rx changes yet again---in either direction.
--LB, O.D.
|