-20 D myopic prescription under self treatment

Discussion in 'Optometry Archives' started by g.gatti, Feb 4, 2005.

  1. g.gatti

    g.gatti Guest

    Good news from our client who is treating her imperfect sight after
    having discarded her strong myopic glasses.

    Today we managed to read the 50 line of the white Snelln chart at 8
    feet, indoors, with a good light pointing on the eyechart.

    So the "remote" point is slowly slowly becoming more remote every day
    of work.

    Other interesting dfevelopments are that the "eccentric fixation2 has
    been reduced to half a meter. The original measurement at two meters
    distance from the big C of the 200 line gave a value of TWO meters of
    eccentric fixation: so the improvement up to now has been of FOUR
    TIMES!!!

    With the third line (letter P of the Bates' original Snellen chart) of
    the 70 feet, the eccentric fixation is reduced to 30 cm.

    Please do not reply to this message.
     
    g.gatti, Feb 4, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. g.gatti

    otisbrown Guest

    Dear Rishi,

    Rather that using the "50" line, why not
    keep it simple and provide the
    SIZE of the letter and the
    distance. The would be
    an OBJECTIVE measurement.

    Best,

    Otis
    Engineer
     
    otisbrown, Feb 4, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. g.gatti

    g.gatti Guest

    I am referring to the original Snellen chart I produce,
    http://TheCentralFixation.com

    If I say 50-line, this means the line of letters calibrated for normal
    vision at fifty feet distance.

    It is already an objective data.

    Read Dr. Bates book.
     
    g.gatti, Feb 4, 2005
    #3
  4. g.gatti

    otisbrown Guest

    Dear Rishi,

    The normal way you state her vision (VA) on the eye chart
    is to say she has 20/50 vision.

    Or the ability to read 7/8 inch letters at 20 feet.

    Truly an amazing change from -20 diopters.

    Perhaps we should send a deligation of ODs
    over to your place to verify this result.

    Congratulations.

    Best,

    Otis
    Engineer
     
    otisbrown, Feb 5, 2005
    #4
  5. g.gatti

    RM Guest

    This posting is an automatic reply to any sci.med.vision newsgroup thread
    that is receiving comments from a person named "Otis", "Otis Brown",
    "" or "Otis, Engineer".

    Otis is not an expert in any field of vision. His medical and eyecare
    training is nil. He is a proponent of a myopia prevention technique that is
    unproven.

    In addition, Otis continually misquotes people in his posts. He drops the
    names of doctors whom he falsely claims to be associated with. He has been
    caught in out-and-out lies. He has given people incorrect medical advise.
    Sadly, his behavior suggests he may have psychological problems that compel
    him to argue against people just for the sake of causing an argument.

    Otis is what is known in internet newsgroup lingo as a "troll". Do not
    reply to his postings-- it just takes up bandwidth and storage space that
    should be reserved for meaningful topics. It also just fulfils his sick
    psychological needs.

    No one means to suppress the honest opinions of others. This message is
    only meant to forewarn anyone who might misconstrue Otis as a trained
    eyecare expert.

    For anyone who is interested in understanding the current state of
    scientific/medical research on myopia prevention, I offer the following
    link: http://annals.edu.sg/pdf200401/V33N1p4.pdf. If you have other topics
    you wish to discuss, there are experts here who will usually help you.
    Don't waste your time with Otis.

    Please see the weekly posting "welcome to sci.med.vision" which usually
    appears on Mondays, for information on how to filter out Otis' posts so that
    you may be able to participate in worthwhile discussions in this forum.
     
    RM, Feb 5, 2005
    #5
  6. g.gatti

    g.gatti Guest

    This post is an automatic reply to the idiotic automatic messages this
    super idiot named RM publishes regularly on this open forum.

    This particularly spicy-ful idiot is against any new method or science
    that can help the patient affected by imperfect sight to cure himself
    or herself by means of the only method that works, that is REST.

    Don't you be bothered by this special idiot.

    It is just another specimen of the endless idiots who call themselves
    "doctors" but in fact they just destroy people's eyesight and in so
    doing, their life.
     
    g.gatti, Feb 5, 2005
    #6
  7. g.gatti

    g.gatti Guest

    Please, read better.

    The girl is under treatment, she does not want to be bothered by
    idiotic-scientists until she is cured permanently.
     
    g.gatti, Feb 5, 2005
    #7
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.