-8 myopes that can see 1 inch led digits without glasses from distance

How can you explain these facts?

You cannot, unless you accept that refraction is something that changes
so quickly that you cannot understand how the mind can track it and
rebuild a clear picture in the visual field, despite the myopic
"average" state.

Those who are REALLY INTERESTED in these matters, should do something.

Practice rest methods, train your imagination, and get a cure for your
imperfect sight!!!

It's not impossible!!!

There are testimonies of this.

It can happen!!!


--
Please visit
http://www.stores.ebay.it/juppiterconsultingrishi
and you can buy a replica of the Original Dr. Bates book
"Perfect Sight Without Glasses"
and if you are interested, join the group
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/PerfectSight/

 

please, with or without glasses?

Your wife has not normal sight.

--
Please visit
http://www.stores.ebay.it/juppiterconsultingrishi
and you can buy a replica of the Original Dr. Bates book
"Perfect Sight Without Glasses"
and if you are interested, join the group
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/PerfectSight/

 

Why do you say his pupil is large in the night?
This is not so easy to believe because pupils do not behave as you think.
There are people who have very large pupils in the daylight also,
expecially lasiked people, suffering the trauma.

It is true also the reverse.

There are people with tiny pupils even in the night.

Ask you patient if his wife can check the pupil at night.

He says he sees a perfect image, you should ask if this image is in the
center. Is it in the center (where he is MORE myopic)???

Ask your patient if the images change when he looks at them more through
the eccentric field.

According to your explanation, he should see them BETTER when outside
the central field, and WORSE at the center because there the cornea is
steeper.

Isn't it right?

Now he will answer you that these images dance with no logic at all.

Ask him.



--
Please visit
http://www.stores.ebay.it/juppiterconsultingrishi
and you can buy a replica of the Original Dr. Bates book
"Perfect Sight Without Glasses"
and if you are interested, join the group
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/PerfectSight/

 

Mike Tyner wrote:

You test all what you want to test, not the truth.

Of course your statement was wrong: what you say is not always right,
but you forget this and offer only the facts that suit you and call
these facts scientific!

I didn't know too: but all the people after lasik have grown pupils
large. Do you think there is a meaning?

Anyway I rely on what Dr. Bates says, which was a doctor like you and
visited many thousands of people, not like you: he states that in
perfect sighted people the pupil does not change very much.

And that a pinhole pupil has been observed in patient in the dark.

To me this is sufficient to say that there are no fixed rules and you
are not telling the truth.

I don't measure anything. I just talk out of my own experience of a cure
of myopia and that of others.

I'm interested in the healthy man.

How many people you visit which are healthy, at least in the eyes, with
20/10 vision? How many have you tested?

Give a number (20/10 without any glasses or surgery!)

You said that old people and hyperopes have this occourrence, so what is
the truth?

You see you speak out of authority and not out of true science, which is
analyzing the facts.

You prefer to discard the facts which are not in tune with your own
theory about them.

So 100 years have not passed: we are still in the times of Dr. Bates,
when people like you discarded the fact that afakic eyes were able to
accomodate.

I was not saying this, you were saying this!!!
I say that the cornea does not have much influence about multiple
images, I say they are created in the mind and not in the retina.

I think you are mismatching things here.

According to my understanding, a scratch is not very much important. the
true importance is in the mind that interprets the retina images.

Your friend creates multiple images out of mental strain.

Ask him.

The book I sell has helped me to cure my own imperfect sight, and any
day I get better. Has helped many other people too!!!

Yesterday I have spotted for few instants some letters on the 20/10 line.

I know it happened in a flash, not very continuous and not repeatable by
will, but day by day I become more confident.

I am drawn day by day to perfect sight without glasses.

When I see that vision tends to blur when I read a paper, I suddenly am
reminded of central fixation and move away my gaze. Everything turns out
to become clear again!

After you see some 20/10 letters, you understand many things.

First, that the size of letters we are accustomed to is really too big!
And this is a great source of strain, mental strain.

I am practicing reading at the near point a 9x reduction of a A4 page
printed in very small print (in fact, a reduction of a tabloid paper).

To let you understand, please visit www.ilfoglio.it and download a pdf
you find on the left corner.

Then print it with 9x reduction, and you can understand what I am doing.

--
Please visit
http://www.stores.ebay.it/juppiterconsultingrishi
and you can buy a replica of the Original Dr. Bates book
"Perfect Sight Without Glasses"
and if you are interested, join the group
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/PerfectSight/

 

This description fits in with my interpretation of what I saw before my
cataract was removed. It was my fly's eye interpretation.

I do not think that the lens is "clearer." What I think is happening is that
this small portion of the aperture acts like a pinhole. The combination of
lens an pinhole can give a pretty decent image. Because the LED is
relatively bright, Using the open pupil is not a detriment to sharp vision,
color vision, or insufficient brightness.

Bill

 

Yes. Old people and hyperopes. Of course you knew that because you've measured
so many.[/QUOTE]

I think that you aren't measuring them correctly, Mike. Take a patient
and put them in a dim room. Now look at their pupils. You won't be able
to see them, because it's too dark. So take a couple of honkin' big
flashlights and shine them in the patient's eyes. Wait a couple of
minutes for your eyes to adjust. Now look at the pupils. You will find
that nearly all pupils will be small, even in a dim room like that.

 

Nonetheless, there are people who are myopic but have not been operated
of cataracts that see multiple images DANCING and changing.

Their cornea is "regular" and everything is ok.

If they happen to rest their eyes, multiple images tend to disappear.

If they happen to rise the strain in the mind, a strain to see, multiple
images get worse.


By the way, the led is not bright at all, in fact in the day is scarcely
visible. It is the contrast between the darkness in the room at night
that creates a new source of strain for the tense mind to work with. The
result is multiple images.

This is not by any menas true for all.

There are myopic people who cannot see anything of the led without
glasses in the darkness.

Again this means that their strain is different: in this case, the
strain acts on the refraction, and the eye is out of focus.

In the previous case, refraction was quite right, because the led was
seen keenly at least in one imagine, and the multeplicity of images was
created mentally.

 

And you work for an University?

 

Yeah, I'm the night janitor.



You *do* know what the above symbol means?

 

A night idiot.

 

"Dan Abel" <> schreef in bericht
major snip...

I'm able to measure with the help of infrared and so do others.
This kind of measurment is also used to determin the pupil in low or dark
light circumstances to see if someone is a candidate for LASIK,LASEK etc..

Jan (normally Dutch spoken)