Acuvue advance for astigmatism compared to B&L soflens 66

Discussion in 'Optometry Archives' started by greg.kandra, Dec 1, 2005.

  1. greg.kandra

    greg.kandra Guest

    Any feedback from folks out there on which is better or more preferred?
    I'm on the fence as to which I'm going to go with and want to ping the
    audience for additional experiences out there. Thanks.
     
    greg.kandra, Dec 1, 2005
    #1

    1. Advertisements

  2. greg.kandra

    CatmanX Guest

    Personally, I hate the B&L lens as the material dries out all the time.
    Purevision is a much better material.

    Instead of asking for advice over the net, get your OD to trial some
    lenses and see which is most comfortable for you. Besides there are
    many other good toric lenses on the market besides these two.

    dr grant
     
    CatmanX, Dec 1, 2005
    #2

    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads

  1. Soflens 66 vs comfort

  2. Acuvue Advance for Astigmatism?

  3. New ACUVUE(R) ADVANCE(TM) Brand Contact Lenses for ASTIGMATISM

  4. acuvue advance for astigmatisms

  5. Acuvue Advance for astigmatism and hyperopia

  6. Soflens66 toric vs. Accuvue Advance for Astigmatism??

  7. B&L PureVision Toric VS Acuvue Advance for Astigmatism

  8. AcuVue Toric material same as AcuVue Oasys or AcuVue 2?

Loading...