Catch 22 ..............................

Discussion in 'Optometry Archives' started by Jan, Aug 11, 2009.

  1. Jan

    Jan Guest

    Otis, for the first time I have read something wise from your pen.

    Indeed this newsgroup with you and your nonsense and our answers on your
    nonsense in trying to convince you you are absoluty a quack.

    CATCH22 and we all (including you) are in it.

    Jan (normally Dutch spoken)
    Jan, Aug 11, 2009
    1. Advertisements

  2. Jan

    Otis Guest

    And for those interested, read:

    Here is part of the movie:

    The issue is this -- same as for Ignaz Semmelwiss

    Ignaz found that it was NOT the mid-wives who were causing death rates
    of 20 to 40 percent.

    So even AFTER Ignaz demonstarted a reduction to 1 percent, the OTHER
    doctors called him a Quack, and dismissed the entire idea -- since
    everyone KNEW that germs did not exist and Ignaz was a Quack.

    This Catch-22 is that you can not get the "doctors" to run a study --
    to prove that the doctors themselves are the "exercabting" agent.

    Thanks for the suggestion, Jan, for this review.

    Otis, Aug 12, 2009
    1. Advertisements

  3. Jan

    Neil Brooks Guest

    Who cares about "Ignaz?"

    Do YOU have any evidence that an appropriately prescribed minus lens
    accelerates myopic progression OR that a plus lens prevents, halts, or
    reverses it??

    It's a fair question.
    I never tire of YOU posting things that DIRECTLY contradict YOUR

    Here's the latest:"Myopia"

    I see SEVERAL plus lens tests listed there.

    You don't??

    WTF is WRONG with you, Man???
    I really hope he DOES Nejoy ... you blithering idiot :)
    Neil Brooks, Aug 12, 2009
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.