How could these people investigate the truth about vision ?

Can this sneaky person ever consider to cure people without
glasses ? I doubt it.

No wonder he has little arguments, hides behind "science",
and stops answering my questions and points preferring
to play with this annoying troll thing and deriding.

Here is where business and science clash.

How sad.

 

Here you go again, and again.

Answer my questions in the previous threads, instead.
Yours is certainly a well architected business: you send
clients to them and they give you office space. If you
start to cure people without glasses they won't give you
office space. Call it a conspiracy, call it a smart business,
call it what you want, but the patients are kept in misery
and suffering. They have faith in you and you fool them,
knowing well that they will need new glasses.

This is SAD !

Besides, what's this conspiracy thing ? I addressed
some very precise points and you avoided them with
that stupid sarcasm. This is not in your favor, mind you.

The "professionals" and the fools that are befooled by
them ARE NOT the whole world. There are PLENTY of
people that REFUSE to wear glasses that you prescribe
(and indirectly sell). I personally know a lot of people that
have normal sight and were prescribed glasses but
refused to wear them, resulting in their vision getting
better and back to normal. I know also of people (myself
included) that STUPIDLY wore glasses and that entered
in a life of suffering and discomfort and now are recovered
or recovering and feel much better.

"Official science" is NOT the Word Of God handed to
men on stone. Science is a growing phenomenon refining
itself in its evolution. Remaining stuck and closed to new
discoveries is not the nature of science. It's the nature
of cunning priests and unfair salesmen.

 

That's right. It's a conspiracy. The whole world is plotting against you.

The whole world, except few intelligent individuals, is a confederacy of dunces.

 

Mortimer Snurd, surely?

--
Regards,
Nicolaas.


- How much of what we see is caused by what we expect?

 

Once again you avoid answering. How sad.

Be scientific: please define the terms and show where they apply.

Lol.

By the way, you haven't ever read a page of the book written by
Bates. That's clear.

 

One has do be a real fool to go to "professionals" that
behave like you do on this newsgroup.

They even follow your advice ! Lol !

 

Dear Friends,

It always is surprising how rapidly these conversations
degenerate in to "name calling".

Why is that?

Mike?

Evaristio?

Jan?

Judy?

Rishi?

Is it because you have not defined your subject
with sufficient clarity?

Best,

Otis
Engineer

________________