Problem with No-Line Bifocals

Mrs Brainy,
Without respect to you,

"computer glasses" is just new marketing twist
to cell more glasses for population at 30-40.
Lena

 

Ms Brainy,
I am sorry, I wrote:
Without respect to you,

It might probably, sounds like I do not respect you.
At least it sounds not polite.

I meant that I do not mean your computer glasses.

Lena.

 

They do not force
They give time to use.
It is not me.

Forget progressives, it is OK.
(sorry, still do not think so )

It is bad
to fit person which reads perfectly in +3.25
It is bad to push that person to read in +6,
never ever checking again.

And it is even OK, if we think, that the person is 45

But if pseudo-doctor can do it one time it means that it is the
system.
It means that she does the same with children.

 

Plastic feast

 

X-No-Archive: yes

Now who are you talking about?

You're changing the subject and making up a new hypothetical case that
LACKS any substantive information.

Uh, it's recommended to have annual eye exams.

Just because YOU hate eye doctors doesn't mean that others don't get
evaluated annually, if not more frequently.

If a person is 45, then it probably IS okay .... that they're 45. I'm
43. I think THAT's okay, too. Even if I didn't think so, there's
really nothing to be done about it ... unless you're Otis ... and then
you'd just lie.

Google Translate did NOT help me get anything usable out of your last
sentence.

I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about ... but ... that
works out just fine because ... neither do you.

So ... because an eye doctor puts a high plus prescription on ME ... I
should assume that the same eye doctor puts a high plus prescription
on ALL his/her patients?

Is your "MS Physics" from a mail-order college, by any chance, or from
Capitol College, like our demented troll, Uncle Otie??

 

No, My University is the One of the best on the Globe.

MS CS is from regular University here.

 

Do not really belive in lens flex at 40.

 

I did not mean that. I did not mean ODs.

if it is progressives it is better second pair.
Down glaze on computer with chin up not really excited.
..
Regular reading glasses work sometimes not worse.
computer-papers-computer
Even after progressives.
How to explain that ?

 

I know,
You gave +3.5 your error is 0.00

 

I know , i wrote better 2nd pair

What is your distance ? (if you would like to answer)

Are you OD ?

It is not my symptoms
refractometer avr. +2.5
some astigmatizm depends from axis
like sph var. from +2.75 to 2.25 cyl. from -1 to -0.25

It was like 0 5 years ago ( do not know astigm.)

L

 

What do you mean ?
Please, Why?

Distance + 2
+1.25 also comfortable.

age 45

not my age my is 40.

Lena.

 

What do you mean accurate distance prescription ?
Can it be checked with IVAC ?
Rule is 0.5 less then refractometer , what she-OD did.

 

if it is clear at 1.25 why distance should be +2 ?

why not +1.25

I understand that it will not be the accurate from the point that you
asking.

Right.
I ' ll go to OD and tell all that.

Why not the firs when it is not blurry? 1.25

 

I was thinking how that mmmmm-she
push him into all the time wearing.

You explained me that now.
+2 it is not accurate

I 'll be not precise now
by memory:

the name of that " how much eye can take"
it covers not only real hyperopia but also latent or facultative (some
of it under cycloplegia)

she push him into "how much eye can take "

All of you say that glasses not spoil vision
They do spoil
She did it perfectly.
Congrats.

 

I did not expect that it is that way
Way is perfect.
It is no going to give failure.
Scientific.

Did you watch "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest."

Whatever he did they were one step upfront.

 

I am no angry,
just surprised.
just surprised with that kind of science.
just writing brief.

it is to push
How Much Eye Can Take
and the person is still comfortable.

and in one year when adaptation make the job

Push again.

eye will can take now More D


same with Myopia

1 year pushing cycle

adaptation- pushing-adaptation-pushing

and person is comfortable

 

I did not mean to be unpolite with you.
You just described how to make the add less
what from you point of view is good.
probably.
but better not push glasses for all time use onto person.

 

this is correct. if all you want is minimal plus power then you will
have problems reading again very quickly. hyperopia proceeds quickly
after age 40.

so now i understand. you are becoming more hyperopic so quickly that
you are thinking that it is unnatural and that the doctor has done
something to you to make it happen. no, nature and aging are
responsible.

in the beginning, I think what you are saying is indeed correct for
hyperopia only (not for myopia). if you are given more plus, then
your eye will take it and love it (the ciliary muscle is tired and
wants the help). but after a few years it will quit anyway and
whether the doctor gave you lots of plus in the beginning or only a
little plus in the beginning, you will end up in the same place.
certainly you don't think the eye is changing its size or shape
because of the lenses that are put on it do you? the only difference
will be that if the doctor gives you minimal plus then you will need
to get new glasses every year.

but regardless, in the end your prescription ends up in the same
place.

 

its going to happen anyway. aging causes the ciliary muscle to relax
and when it is entirely relaxed you will end up with the same
prescription whether or not the doctor pushed the plus on you early or
whether they held it to minimal changes. the only difference is that
you will buy lots of pairs of glasses if you prefer only minimal
increases in plus.

 

It is not - accommodation works.

I just did not understand How to push 20/20 into all time wearing.

It is explanation.