Why are some things considered "bad for the eyes" without proof thatthey are?

Discussion in 'Optometry Archives' started by Just another dude, May 4, 2010.

  1. Just another dude

    Just another dude Guest

    Reading lying down
    Reading in moving vehicles
    Reading in dim light
    Reading fine print
    Reading close to the eyes
    Bright lights
    Artificial lights
    Sudden fluctuations of light
    the list goes on.
     
    Just another dude, May 4, 2010
    #1

    1. Advertisements

  2. Just another dude

    Just another dude Guest

    Funny thing is he RECOMMENDED all these things.
     
    Just another dude, May 10, 2010
    #2

    1. Advertisements

  3. Just another dude

    Neil Brooks Guest

    ...
     
    Neil Brooks, May 10, 2010
    #3

    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads

  1. What is considered high hyperopia?

  2. Plus, some things never change

  3. things getting dimmer?

  4. Rimless with High Rx - some say yes and some say no

  5. Plus Prevention Considered at Threshold

  6. Is CK considered permanent now?

  7. Why do optometrists do things an ophthalmologist should do, and viceversa?

  8. 10 Things Eye Doctors Won't Tell You...

Loading...